100 Days of A11y

6 Theoretical Models of Disability

Published on

In my last post Basic Disability Concepts, I mentioned that we all need a perspective check when we design websites and start thinking about people with disabilities. Turns out that there are many different theoretical models that have been proposed on this very topic of how we perceive disabilities! I've encountered a couple of these before, thanks to Sarah Horton's and Whitney Quesenbery's book A Web for Everyone (Amazon).

The models I cover in this post:

  1. medical,
  2. social,
  3. economic,
  4. functional solutions,
  5. social identity, and
  6. charity.

There are more than 6 models that have been theorized, but I only offer them a mention, and provide resources at the end to get you started on your own research.

Medical

Permalink for "Medical"

The medical model (perspective) views disability as a medically-diagnosed biological problem due to genetic disorders, disease, trauma, or other health conditions. Law leans this definition to critically evaluate whether a person is impaired "enough" to receive benefits or accommodation. The person has a problem that needs to be cured or fixed.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Social

Permalink for "Social"

The social model (perspective) views disability as a condition created by bad design. Society's ecosystem institutes barriers for people. It's in response to the medical model, and rallies for change in the culture and ideology of society to be more inclusive.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Economic

Permalink for "Economic"

The economic model (perspective) views disability as the inability of a person to work and contribute to society. It's related to the Charity/Tragedy model.

Strength:

Weaknesses:

Functional Solutions

Permalink for "Functional Solutions"

The functional solutions model (perspective) views disability as problem to be solved. Specifically, it seeks to overcome physical limitations with technology. It cares less about the social or political nuances, but rather strives for innovation as its motivation. Accessibility professionals often live in this space.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Social Identity / Cultural Affiliation

Permalink for "Social Identity / Cultural Affiliation"

The social identity or cultural affiliation model (perspective) views disability as a community. People who identify with a particular group or culture (e.g. deaf culture) become more involved with that culture and embrace their disability as part of their identity.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Charity/Tragedy

Permalink for "Charity/Tragedy"

The charity or tragedy model (perspective) views disability as tragic, unfortunate, or inspirational. When this perspective becomes an attitude, it can become offensive to people with disabilities.

Strength:

Weaknesses:

Other Models

Permalink for "Other Models"

In addition to the models I've dissected in this post, there were other honorable mentions in the CPACC coursework I'm working through; all of which have their own merits and pitfalls.

Are you familiar with any other models that haven't been mentioned here?

Where Do You Stand?

Permalink for "Where Do You Stand?"

I don't know about you, but all these models have given me a lot to think about, challenging my own perspective and world view. The variety of definitions have offered some confirmation on thoughts I've had. In contrast, they've pointed out some of my own fault in thinking about myself and others.

In order to do the work of advocating for people with disabilities and developing websites with accessibility in mind, we need to understand our own point of view. Believe it or not, our work is colored by our current perspective. Before we can have conversations with people with disabilities, we need to evaluate where we stand and what language we use.

What does "disability" mean to you?

Resources I Found Helpful

Permalink for "Resources I Found Helpful"